Business owners: Have you paused to consider how well your company initially responded to the COVID-19 pandemic? Update your disaster plan before the details fade.

It’s been a year like no other. The sudden impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in March forced every business owner — ready or not — to execute his or her disaster response plan.

So, how did yours do? Although it may still be a little early to do a complete assessment of what went right and wrong during the crisis, you can take a quick look back right now while the experience is still fresh in your mind.

Get specific

When devising a disaster response plan, brainstorm as many scenarios as possible that could affect your company. What weather-related, environmental and socio-political threats do you face? Obviously, you can now add “pandemic” to the list.

The operative word, however, is “your.” Every company faces distinctive threats related to its industry, size, location(s), and products or services. Identify these as specifically as possible, based on what you’ve learned.

There are some constants for nearly every plan. Seek out alternative suppliers who could fill in for your current ones if necessary. Fortify your IT assets and functionality with enhanced recovery and security capabilities.

Communicate optimally

Another critical factor during and after a crisis is communication, both internal and external. Review whether and how your business was able to communicate in the initial months of the pandemic.

You and most of your management team probably needed to concentrate on maintaining or restoring operations. Who communicated with employees and other stakeholders to keep them abreast of your response and recovery progress? Typically, these parties include:

• Staff members and their families,
• Customers,
• Suppliers,
• Banks and other financial stakeholders, and
• Local authorities, first responders and community leaders (as appropriate).

Look into the communication channels that were used — such as voicemail, text messaging, email, website postings and social media. Which were most and least effective? Would some type of new technology enable your business to communicate better?

Revisit and update

If the events of this past spring illustrate anything, it’s that companies can’t create a disaster response plan and toss it on a shelf. Revisit the plan at least annually, looking for adjustments and new risk factors.

You’ll also want to keep the plan clear in the minds of your employees. Be sure that everyone — including new hires — knows exactly what to do by spelling out the communication channels, contacts and procedures you’ll use in the event of a disaster. Everyone should sign a written confirmation that they’ve read the plan’s details, either when hired or when the plan is substantially updated.

In addition, go over disaster response measures during company meetings once or twice a year. You might even want to hold live drills to give staff members a chance to practice their roles and responsibilities.

Heed the lessons

For years, advisors urged business owners to prepare for disasters or else. This year we got the “or else.” Despite the hardships and continuing challenges, however, the lessons being learned are invaluable. Please contact us to discuss ways to manage costs and maintain profitability during these difficult times.

If you invest in mutual funds, be aware of some potential pitfalls involved in buying and selling shares.

Surprise sales 

You may already have made taxable “sales” of part of your mutual fund investment without knowing it.

One way this can happen is if your mutual fund allows you to write checks against your fund investment. Every time you write a check against your mutual fund account, you’ve made a partial sale of your interest in the fund. Thus, except for funds such as money market funds, for which share value remains constant, you may have taxable gain (or a deductible loss) when you write a check. And each such sale is a separate transaction that must be reported on your tax return.

Here’s another way you may unexpectedly make a taxable sale. If your mutual fund sponsor allows you to make changes in the way your money is invested — for instance, lets you switch from one fund to another fund — making that switch is treated as a taxable sale of your shares in the first fund.

Recordkeeping 

Carefully save all the statements that the fund sends you — not only official tax statements, such as Forms 1099-DIV, but the confirmations the fund sends you when you buy or sell shares or when dividends are reinvested in new shares. Unless you keep these records, it may be difficult to prove how much you paid for the shares, and thus, you won’t be able to establish the amount of gain that’s subject to tax (or the amount of loss you can deduct) when you sell.

You also need to keep these records to prove how long you’ve held your shares if you want to take advantage of favorable long-term capital gain tax rates. (If you get a year-end statement that lists all your transactions for the year, you can just keep that and discard quarterly or other interim statements. But save anything that specifically says it contains tax information.)

Recordkeeping is simplified by rules that require funds to report the customer’s basis in shares sold and whether any gain or loss is short-term or long-term. This is mandatory for mutual fund shares acquired after 2011, and some funds will provide this to shareholders for shares they acquired earlier, if the fund has the information.

Timing purchases and sales

If you’re planning to invest in a mutual fund, there are some important tax consequences to take into account in timing the investment. For instance, an investment shortly before payment of a dividend is something you should generally try to avoid. Your receipt of the dividend (even if reinvested in additional shares) will be treated as income and increase your tax liability. If you’re planning a sale of any of your mutual fund shares near year-end, you should weigh the tax and the non-tax consequences in the current year versus a sale in the next year.

Identify shares you sell 

If you sell fewer than all of the shares that you hold in the same mutual fund, there are complicated rules for identifying which shares you’ve sold. The proper application of these rules can reduce the amount of your taxable gain or qualify the gain for favorable long-term capital gain treatment.

Contact us if you’d like to find out more about tax planning for buying and selling mutual fund shares.

A new law signed by President Trump on March 27 provides a variety of tax and financial relief measures to help Americans during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This article explains some of the tax relief for individuals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act

Individual cash payments

Under the new law, an eligible individual will receive a cash payment equal to the sum of: $1,200 ($2,400 for eligible married couples filing jointly) plus $500 for each qualifying child. Eligibility is based on adjusted gross income (AGI).

Individuals who have no income, as well as those whose income comes entirely from Social Security benefits, are also eligible for the payment.

The AGI thresholds will be based on 2019 tax returns, or 2018 returns if you haven’t yet filed your 2019 returns. For those who don’t qualify on their most recently filed tax returns, there may be another option to receive some money. An individual who isn’t an eligible individual for 2019 may be eligible for 2020. The IRS won’t send cash payments to him or her. Instead, the individual will be able to claim the credit when filing a 2020 return.

The income thresholds

The amount of the payment is reduced by 5% of AGI in excess of:

• $150,000 for a joint return,
• $112,500 for a head of household, and
• $75,000 for all other taxpayers.

But there is a ceiling that leaves some taxpayers ineligible for a payment. Under the rules, the payment is completely phased-out for a single filer with AGI exceeding $99,000 and for joint filers with no children with AGI exceeding $198,000. For a head of household with one child, the payment is completely phased out when AGI exceeds $146,500.

Most eligible individuals won’t have to take any action to receive a cash payment from the IRS. The payment may be made into a bank account if a taxpayer filed electronically and provided bank account information. Otherwise, the IRS will mail the payment to the last known address.

Other tax provisions

There are several other tax-related provisions in the CARES Act. For example, a distribution from a qualified retirement plan won’t be subject to the 10% additional tax if you’re under age 59 ½ — as long as the distribution is related to COVID-19. And the new law allows charitable deductions, beginning in 2020, for up $300 even if a taxpayer doesn’t itemize deductions.

Stay tuned

These are only a few of the tax breaks in the CARES Act. We’ll cover additional topics in coming weeks. In the meantime, please contact us if you have any questions about your situation.

In the last issue of the Funeral Business Advisor, we talked about stuff. Specifically, we acknowledged that as the owner of a funeral home, you’re constantly buying stuff for various reasons and among your considerations in choosing what stuff to buy are the tax implications. Will buying this stuff lower my taxes? The answer was (surprise!) “It depends”. In our previous article, we dealt with the small stuff; i.e. inventory, supplies, furniture, equipment and vehicles. In this issue, we’re going to focus on the big stuff: real estate.

Buying real estate will be one of the largest investments you’ll make as a business owner. Even with bank financing, you’ll likely need to make a substantial down payment to acquire a desired property. You would think that, having drained your bank account to make that big investment, there has to be some large tax write-off that goes with it, right? “WRONG!” Despite the big investment required to buy real estate, the annual write-off you get from real estate under the tax code is small in comparison. It all has to do with depreciation. Let me explain.

Generally under the tax code, property that you use over a number of years is not expensed immediately when it is purchased. Rather, you deduct the property’s cost over its depreciable life. The property’s depreciable life is determined under the tax code, and the annual deduction is called depreciation expense. For example, if you purchase a hearse (which has a depreciable life of 5 years) for $60,000, the annual deductible depreciation expense is $12,000 ($60,000 ÷ 5 years). As explained in our previous article, there are provisions in the tax code that allow you to immediately expense personal property rather than having to depreciate it over several years, but those exceptions rarely apply to real estate. As you’ve probably guessed by now, your depreciation deduction depends heavily on the depreciable life of the asset and therein lies the problem. Under the tax code, the depreciable life of a funeral home building is 39 years! Furthermore, if you make substantial capital improvements to your property, those improvements also need to be depreciated over 39 years. Considering you probably have a 15 or 20 year mortgage, you can see that your building will be paid off long before you will have completely written it off for your taxes. So what can you do to accelerate the deductible cost of your property? Here are some options.

Consider a Cost Segregation Study
One of the key strategies in maximizing and accelerating the depreciation deduction for your property is in the allocation of its cost. The cost of a property must first be allocated between land and building. Allocation here is important because land cannot be depreciated, so you will receive no tax benefit from the land cost until later when the property is sold. So it’s important to be aggressively reasonable when allocating a portion of your purchase price to land.

Once you’ve carved out the cost of the land, what remains is the building which, as previously mentioned, must be depreciated over 39 years. However, the tax regulations allow you to break out your property into various components which can be depreciated over shorter lives, thereby increasing and accelerating your depreciation deduction. To do this, you need to have a cost segregation study (CSS) performed on your property. The CSS is performed by engineers who will examine your property and provide you with a report which breaks out the cost of your property into several “asset classes” of varying depreciable lives. The result is that rather than having to depreciate the cost of your entire building over 39 years, portions of it will be depreciated over 5, 7 or 15 years thereby increasing and accelerating your depreciation deductions in the earlier years of ownership. By way of example, a client of mine purchased a property for $2.5M. By having a CSS performed on the property, my client was able to claim additional depreciation expense of approximately $330,000 over the first five years the property was owned thereby significantly reducing his tax liability during that time.

Although performing a CSS on your property sounds like a great idea, there are a few considerations to keep in mind. First, a properly done CSS will set you back $5,000 to $7,000 depending on the property. As such, it doesn’t make economic sense to do a CSS if the cost allocated to your building is less than $800,000. Second, a CSS only allows you to depreciate portions of your building faster. Once your building has reached the end of its depreciable life, the total depreciation you will have taken on that property will be no different regardless of how it was written off. If you paid $750,000 for your building, that’s all you’ll get to depreciate. The CSS just allows you to write off that $750,000 at a faster rate, and because a deduction today is worth more than a deduction five years from now, the CSS could be worth doing. Third, work closely with your tax advisor to ensure the accelerated depreciation will provide you the intended tax benefits. There are various other provisions within our complicated tax code that can lessen the tax benefits coming out of a CSS, so best to know those before you spend the money on a CSS.

Repairs vs Capital Improvements
So you are now the proud owner of a beautiful funeral home. For obvious reasons, funeral home owners are well known for meticulously maintaining their stuff, especially their properties. But that gets expensive. Whether all those costs are tax deductible depends on what you’re doing to the property and as you would expect, the IRS doesn’t make that easy. There are hundreds of pages of regulations which deal with this (known as “the repair regs”), but we’ll stick to the basics.

First, a repair is deductible immediately while a capital improvement needs to be depreciated. That makes a repair more tax advantageous than a capital improvement. So what’s the difference between a repair and a capital improvement? It really depends on nature of the “improvement” and here’s how it works.

The tax regulations require you to look at your building as a structure with a collection of “systems.” Examples of these systems are HVAC, electrical, plumbing, elevator, etc. If you restore or improve a substantial portion of the building structure or any of these systems, that will be a capital improvement which will need to be depreciated. If it’s not a substantial improvement, then it’s a repair that can be expensed immediately. I know what you’re asking; what does “substantial” mean? The IRS provides no clear definition of what substantial means, but the rule of thumb appears to be 30% of the repaired property. For example, your funeral home has thirty windows. You replace four windows. Since four windows comprise less than 30% of all your windows, you would treat the window replacement as a repair. But suppose you replace 20 windows. You’ve now replaced 66% of your windows, so the replacement cost would be a capital improvement which would need to be depreciated over 39 years.

What do we learn from this? For one thing, proper planning and timing of your building repairs can significantly affect your ability to expense the repair, so plan ahead. Spread projects out over time so you fall below the 30% repair threshold. Secondly, talk to your tax advisor when contemplating large repair or improvement projects. They can work with you to maximize possible write-offs associated with such projects. Finally, ensure your contractor will provide you detailed billing statements for your repair project so as to maximize possible write-offs.

Partial Asset Dispositions
So you’ve concluded that your project is indeed a capital improvement and you are now stuck depreciating it over the next 39 years. However, all hope may not be lost. There is another opportunity to possibly get a substantial write-off associated with a large improvement project. However, it applies only to a refurbishment or improvement of a currently existing property; it does not apply to a building addition or expansion. In tax jargon it’s called a “partial asset disposition” and it’s a relatively new option under the tax code. Here’s how it works.

Suppose you decide to renovate the inside of your funeral home to expand viewing rooms, add bathrooms, etc. You are not expanding your facility, you are simply renovating the current structure. Obviously, such a large project is a capital improvement that must be depreciated. However, what about the structures and systems that you have removed from the building? When you purchased the building, you paid for all those former walls, flooring, electrical systems and other portions of the building. Granted you were depreciating them along with the rest of your building, but they no longer exist. Seems unfair that you would be forced to continue depreciating something that no longer exists, doesn’t it? Furthermore, you should be able to write off the remaining undepreciated portion of the building that has been replaced by the renovation. That’s exactly what you can do through a partial asset disposition (PAD).

A PAD allows you to write off the undepreciated portion of property that has been replaced through a renovation or refurbishment. The amount of the write off will depend on the age and cost of your property. It is unlikely that the write-off will equal the cost of the renovation, but it could be substantial nonetheless and is certainly worth investigating. Finally, demolition costs can be expensed immediately, so be sure your contractor bills you separately for demolition.

Section 179 Election
In our previous article on the tax treatment of stuff (see July/August edition of Funeral Business Advisor) we talked about the Section 179 election. This provision of the tax code allows you to immediately expense the entire cost of property that would otherwise need to be depreciated. It normally doesn’t apply to real estate. However, the recent tax law changes expanded Sec 179 to allow the immediate write-off of certain real estate improvements such as roofs, HVAC property, security systems, etc. It’s important to remember that Sec 179 cannot be used for rental activities. So if you own your building in a separate entity and rent it to your funeral home business, you may not be able to claim an immediate write-off using Sec 179. It’s worth discussing this with your tax advisor.

Of all the stuff you will ever buy, it’s likely that real estate will be your biggest investment. How profitable it may be depends on many factors including the tax benefits or ramifications of owning real estate. As with all investment decisions, knowledge is power so be smart and always speak with your tax advisor before you invest in real estate. FBA

This article is meant to provide general information and should not be construed as legal or tax advice or opinion and is not a substitute advice of counsel, CPAs or other professionals.

A company’s strategic plan can look good on paper but never really work out in real life. Here’s how to ensure your business accomplishes its goals.

In the broadest sense, strategic planning comprises two primary tasks: establishing goals and achieving them. Many business owners would probably say the first part, coming up with objectives, is relatively easy. It’s that second part — accomplishing those goals — that can really challenge a company. The key to turning your strategic objectives into a reality is a solid implementation plan.

Start with people

After clearly identifying short- and long-range goals under a viable strategic planning process, you need to establish a formal plan for carrying it out. The most important aspect of this plan is getting the right people involved.

First, appoint an implementation leader and give him or her the authority, responsibility and accountability to communicate and champion your stated objectives. (If yours is a smaller business, you could oversee implementation yourself.)

Next, establish teams of carefully selected employees with specific duties and timelines under which to complete goal-related projects. Choose employees with the experience, will and energy to implement the plan. These teams should deliver regular progress reports to you and the implementation leader.

Watch out for roadblocks

On the surface, these steps may seem logical and foolproof. But let’s delve into what could go wrong with such a clearly defined process.

One typical problem arises when an implementation team is composed of employees wholly or largely from one department. Often, they’ll (inadvertently or intentionally) execute an objective in such a way that mostly benefits their department but ultimately hinders the company from meeting the intended goal.

To avoid this, create teams with a diversity of employees from across various departments. For example, an objective related to expanding your company’s customer base will naturally need to include members of the sales and marketing departments. But also invite administrative, production and IT staff to ensure the team’s actions are operationally practical and sustainable.

Another common roadblock is running into money problems. Ensure your implementation plan is feasible based on your company’s budget, revenue projections, and local and national economic forecasts. Ask teams to include expense reports and financial projections in their regular reports. If you determine that you can’t (or shouldn’t) implement the plan as written, don’t hesitate to revise or eliminate some goals.

Succeed at the important part

Strategic planning may seem to be “all about the ideas,” but implementing the specific goals related to your strategic plan is really the most important part of the process. Of course, it’s also the most difficult and most affected by outside forces. We can help you assess the financial feasibility of your objectives and design an implementation plan with the highest odds of success.

Did you make large gifts to your heirs in 2018? If so, it’s important to determine whether you’re required to file a gift tax return by April 15 (Oct. 15 if you file for an extension). Generally, you’ll need to file one if you made 2018 gifts that exceeded the $15,000-per-recipient gift tax annual exclusion (unless to your U.S. citizen spouse) and in certain other situations. But sometimes it’s desirable to file a gift tax return even if you aren’t required to. If you’re not sure whether you must (or should) file a 2018 gift tax return, contact us.

Did you make large gifts to your children, grandchildren or other heirs last year? If so, it’s important to determine whether you’re required to file a 2018 gift tax return — or whether filing one would be beneficial even if it isn’t required.

Filing requirements

Generally, you must file a gift tax return for 2018 if, during the tax year, you made gifts:

• That exceeded the $15,000-per-recipient gift tax annual exclusion (other than to your U.S. citizen spouse),
• That you wish to split with your spouse to take advantage of your combined $30,000 annual exclusion,
• That exceeded the $152,000 annual exclusion for gifts to a noncitizen spouse,
• To a Section 529 college savings plan and wish to accelerate up to five years’ worth of annual exclusions ($75,000) into 2018,
• Of future interests — such as remainder interests in a trust — regardless of the amount, or
• Of jointly held or community property.

Keep in mind that you’ll owe gift tax only to the extent an exclusion doesn’t apply and you’ve used up your lifetime gift and estate tax exemption ($11.18 million for 2018). As you can see, some transfers require a return even if you don’t owe tax.

No return required

No gift tax return is required if your gifts for the year consist solely of gifts that are tax-free because they qualify as:

• Annual exclusion gifts,
• Present interest gifts to a U.S. citizen spouse,
• Educational or medical expenses paid directly to a school or health care provider, or
• Political or charitable contributions.

But if you transferred hard-to-value property, such as artwork or interests in a family-owned business, consider filing a gift tax return even if you’re not required to. Adequate disclosure of the transfer in a return triggers the statute of limitations, generally preventing the IRS from challenging your valuation more than three years after you file.

Be ready for April 15

The gift tax return deadline is the same as the income tax filing deadline. For 2018 returns, it’s April 15, 2019 — or October 15, 2019, if you file for an extension. But keep in mind that, if you owe gift tax, the payment deadline is April 15, regardless of whether you file for an extension. If you’re not sure whether you must (or should) file a 2018 gift tax return, contact us.

As we approach the end of 2018, it’s a good idea to review the mutual fund holdings in your taxable accounts and take steps to avoid potential tax traps. Here are some tips.

Avoid surprise capital gains

Unlike with stocks, you can’t avoid capital gains on mutual funds simply by holding on to the shares. Near the end of the year, funds typically distribute all or most of their net realized capital gains to investors. If you hold mutual funds in taxable accounts, these gains will be taxable to you regardless of whether you receive them in cash or reinvest them in the fund.

For each fund, find out how large these distributions will be and get a breakdown of long-term vs. short-term gains. If the tax impact will be significant, consider strategies to offset the gain. For example, you could sell other investments at a loss.

Buyer beware

Avoid buying into a mutual fund shortly before it distributes capital gains and dividends for the year. There’s a common misconception that investing in a mutual fund just before the ex-dividend date (the date by which you must own shares to qualify for a distribution) is like getting free money.

In reality, the value of your shares is immediately reduced by the amount of the distribution. So you’ll owe taxes on the gain without actually making a profit.

Seller beware

If you plan to sell mutual fund shares that have appreciated in value, consider waiting until just after year end so you can defer the gain until 2019 — unless you expect to be subject to a higher rate next year. In that scenario, you’d likely be better off recognizing the gain and paying the tax this year.

When you do sell shares, keep in mind that, if you bought them over time, each block will have a different holding period and cost basis. To reduce your tax liability, it’s possible to select shares for sale that have higher cost bases and longer holding periods, thereby minimizing your gain (or maximizing your loss) and avoiding higher-taxed short-term gains.

Think beyond just taxes

Investment decisions shouldn’t be driven by tax considerations alone. For example, you need to keep in mind your overall financial goals and your risk tolerance.

But taxes are still an important factor to consider. Contact us to discuss these and other year-end strategies for minimizing the tax impact of your mutual fund holdings.

With the April 17 individual income tax filing deadline behind you (or with your 2017 tax return on the back burner if you filed for an extension), you may be hoping to not think about taxes for the next several months. But for maximum tax savings, now is the time to start tax planning for 2018. It’s especially critical to get an early start this year because the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has substantially changed the tax environment.

With the April 17 individual income tax filing deadline behind you (or with your 2017 tax return on the back burner if you filed for an extension), you may be hoping to not think about taxes for the next several months. But for maximum tax savings, now is the time to start tax planning for 2018. It’s especially critical to get an early start this year because the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has substantially changed the tax environment.

Many variables

A tremendous number of variables affect your overall tax liability for the year. Looking at these variables early in the year can give you more opportunities to reduce your 2018 tax bill.

For example, the timing of income and deductible expenses can affect both the rate you pay and when you pay. By regularly reviewing your year-to-date income, expenses and potential tax, you may be able to time income and expenses in a way that reduces, or at least defers, your tax liability.

In other words, tax planning shouldn’t be just a year-end activity.

Certainty vs. uncertainty

Last year, planning early was a challenge because it was uncertain whether tax reform legislation would be signed into law, when it would go into effect and what it would include. This year, the TCJA tax reform legislation is in place, with most of the provisions affecting individuals in effect for 2018–2025. And additional major tax law changes aren’t expected in 2018. So there’s no need to hold off on tax planning.

But while there’s more certainty about the tax law that will be in effect this year and next, there’s still much uncertainty on exactly what the impact of the TCJA changes will be on each taxpayer. The new law generally reduces individual tax rates, and it expands some tax breaks. However, it reduces or eliminates many other breaks.

The total impact of these changes is what will ultimately determine which tax strategies will make sense for you this year, such as the best way to time income and expenses. You may need to deviate from strategies that worked for you in previous years and implement some new strategies.

Getting started sooner will help ensure you don’t take actions that you think will save taxes but that actually will be costly under the new tax regime. It will also allow you to take full advantage of new tax-saving opportunities.

Now and throughout the year

To get started on your 2018 tax planning, contact us. We can help you determine how the TCJA affects you and what strategies you should implement now and throughout the year to minimize your tax liability.

While April 15 (April 17 this year) is the main tax deadline on most individual taxpayers’ minds, there are others through the rest of the year that you also need to be aware of. To help you make sure you don’t miss any important 2018 deadlines, here’s a look at when some key tax-related forms, payments and other actions are due. Keep in mind that this list isn’t all-inclusive, so there may be additional deadlines that apply to you.

While April 15 (April 17 this year) is the main tax deadline on most individual taxpayers’ minds, there are others through the rest of the year that you also need to be aware of. To help you make sure you don’t miss any important 2018 deadlines, here’s a look at when some key tax-related forms, payments and other actions are due. Keep in mind that this list isn’t all-inclusive, so there may be additional deadlines that apply to you.

Please review the calendar and let us know if you have any questions about the deadlines or would like assistance in meeting them.

June 15

• File a 2017 individual income tax return (Form 1040) or file for a four-month extension (Form 4868), and pay any tax and interest due, if you live outside the United States.
• Pay the second installment of 2018 estimated taxes, if not paying income tax through withholding (Form 1040-ES).

September 17

• Pay the third installment of 2018 estimated taxes, if not paying income tax through withholding (Form 1040-ES).

October 1

• If you’re the trustee of a trust or the executor of an estate, file an income tax return for the 2017 calendar year (Form 1041) and pay any tax, interest and penalties due, if an automatic five-and-a-half month extension was filed.

October 15

• File a 2017 income tax return (Form 1040, Form 1040A or Form 1040EZ) and pay any tax, interest and penalties due, if an automatic six-month extension was filed (or if an automatic four-month extension was filed by a taxpayer living outside the United States).
• Make contributions for 2017 to certain retirement plans or establish a SEP for 2017, if an automatic six-month extension was filed.
• File a 2017 gift tax return (Form 709) and pay any tax, interest and penalties due, if an automatic six-month extension was filed.

December 31

• Make 2018 contributions to certain employer-sponsored retirement plans.
• Make 2018 annual exclusion gifts (up to $15,000 per recipient).
• Incur various expenses that potentially can be claimed as itemized deductions on your 2018 tax return. Examples include charitable donations, medical expenses and property tax payments.

But remember that some types of expenses that were deductible on 2017 returns won’t be deductible on 2018 returns under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, such as unreimbursed work-related expenses, certain professional fees, and investment expenses. In addition, some deductions will be subject to new limits. Finally, with the nearly doubled standard deduction, you may no longer benefit from itemizing deductions.

Final regulations clarify the definition of "real property" that qualifies for a like-kind exchange, including incidental personal property. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA, P.L. 115-97), like-kind exchanges occurring after 2017 are limited to real property used in a trade or business or for investment.

Final regulations clarify the definition of "real property" that qualifies for a like-kind exchange, including incidental personal property. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA, P.L. 115-97), like-kind exchanges occurring after 2017 are limited to real property used in a trade or business or for investment.

The final regulations largely adopt regulations that were proposed in June ( NPRM REG-117589-18). However, they also:

• add a " state or local law" test to define real property; and
• reject the “purpose and use” test in the proposed regulations.

In addition, the final regulations classify cooperative housing corporation stock and land development rights as real property. The final regulations also provide that a license, permit, or other similar right is generally real property if it is (i) solely for the use, enjoyment, or occupation of land or an inherently permanent structure; and (ii) in the nature of a leasehold, an easement, or a similar right.

General Definition
Under the final regulations, property is classified as "real property" for like-kind exchange purposes if, on the date it is transferred in the exchange, the property is real property under the law of the state or local jurisdiction in which it is located. The proposed regulations had limited this “state or local law” test to shares in a mutual ditch, reservoir, or irrigation company.

However, the final regulations also clarify that real property that was ineligible for a like-kind exchange before the TCJA remains ineligible. For example, intangible assets that could not be like-kind property before the TCJA (such as stocks, securities, and partnership interests) remain ineligible regardless of how they are characterized under state or local law.

Accordingly, under the final regulations, property is real property if it is:

• classified as real property under state or local law;
• specifically listed as real property in the final regulations; or
• considered real property based on all of the facts and circumstances, under factors provided in the regulations.

These tests mean that property that is not real property under state or local law might still be real property for like-kind exchange purposes if it satisfies the second or third test.

Types of Real Property
Under both the proposed and final regulations, real property for a like-kind exchange is:

• land and improvements to land;
• unsevered crops and other natural products of land; and
• water and air space superjacent to land.

Under both the proposed and final regulations, improvements to land include inherently permanent structures, and the structural components of inherently permanent structures. Each distinct asset must be analyzed separately to determine if it is land, an inherently permanent structure, or a structural component of an inherently permanent structure. The regulations identify several specific items, assets and systems as distinct assets, and provide factors for identifying other distinct assets.

The final regulations also:

• incorporate the language provided in Reg. §1.856-10(d)(2)(i) to provide additional clarity regarding the meaning of "permanently affixed;"
• modify the example in the proposed regulations concerning offshore drilling platforms; and
• clarify that the distinct asset rule applies only to determine whether property is real property, but does not affect the application of the three-property rule for identifying properties in a deferred exchange.

"Purpose or Use" Test
The proposed regulations would have imposed a "purpose or use" test on both tangible and intangible property. Under this test, neither tangible nor intangible property was real property if it contributed to the production of income unrelated to the use or occupancy of space.

The final regulations eliminate the purpose and use test for both tangible and intangible property. Consequently, tangible property is generally an inherently permanent structure—and, thus, real property—if it is permanently affixed to real property and will ordinarily remain affixed for an indefinite period of time. A structural component likewise is real property if it is integrated into an inherently permanent structure. Accordingly, items of machinery and equipment are real property if they comprise an inherently permanent structure or a structural component, or if they are real property under the state or local law test—irrespective of the purpose or use of the items or whether they contribute to the production of income.

Similarly, whether intangible property produces or contributes to the production of income is not considered in determining whether intangible property is real property for like-kind exchange purposes. However, the purpose of the intangible property remains relevant to the determination of whether the property is real property.

Incidental Personal Property
The incidental property rule in the proposed regulations provided that, for exchanges involving a qualified intermediary, personal property that is incidental to replacement real property (incidental personal property) is disregarded in determining whether a taxpayer’s rights to receive, pledge, borrow, or otherwise obtain the benefits of money or non-like-kind property held by the qualified intermediary are expressly limited as provided in Reg. §1.1031(k)-1(g)(6).

Personal property is incidental to real property acquired in an exchange if (i) in standard commercial transactions, the personal property is typically transferred together with the real property, and (ii) the aggregate fair market value of the incidental personal property transferred with the real property does not exceed 15 percent of the aggregate fair market value of the replacement real property (15-percent limitation).

This final regulations adopt these rules with some minor modifications to improve clarity and readability. For example, the final regulations clarify that the receipt of incidental personal property results in taxable gain; and the 15-percent limitation compares the value of all of the incidental properties to the value of all of the replacement real properties acquired in the same exchange.

Effective Dates
The final regulations apply to exchanges beginning after the date they are published as final in the Federal Register. However, a taxpayer may also rely on the proposed regulations published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2020, if followed consistently and in their entirety, for exchanges of real property beginning after December 31, 2017, and before the publication date of the final regulations. In addition, conforming changes to the bonus depreciation rules apply to tax years beginning after the final regulations are published.

The IRS has released rulings concerning deductions for eligible Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan expenses.

The IRS has released rulings concerning deductions for eligible Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan expenses. The rulings:

• deny a deduction if the taxpayer has not yet applied for PPP loan forgiveness, but expects the loan to be forgiven; and
• provide a safe harbor for deducting expenses if PPP loan forgiveness is denied or the taxpayer does not apply for forgiveness.

Background
In response to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) crisis, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) expanded Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act for certain loans made from February 15, 2020, through August 8, 2020 (PPP loans). An eligible PPP loan recipient may have the debt on a covered loan forgiven, and the cancelled debt will be excluded from gross income. To prevent double tax benefits, under Reg. §1.265-1, taxpayers cannot deduct expenses allocable to income that is either wholly excluded from gross income or wholly exempt from tax.

The IRS previously determined that businesses whose PPP loans are forgiven cannot deduct business expenses paid for by the loan ( Notice 2020-32, I.R.B. 2020-21, 837). The new guidance expands on the previous guidance, but provides a safe harbor for taxpayers whose loans are not forgiven.

No Business Deduction
In Rev. Rul. 2020-27, the IRS amplifies guidance in Notice 2020-32. A taxpayer that received a covered PPP loan and paid or incurred certain otherwise deductible expenses may not deduct those expenses in the tax year in which the expenses were paid or incurred if, at the end of the tax year, the taxpayer reasonably expects to receive forgiveness of the covered loan on the basis of the expenses it paid or accrued during the covered period. This is the case even if the taxpayer has not applied for forgiveness by the end of the tax year.

Safe Harbor
In Rev. Proc. 2020-51, the IRS provides a safe harbor allowing taxpayers to claim a deduction in the tax year beginning or ending in 2020 for certain otherwise deductible eligible expenses if:

• the eligible expenses are paid or incurred during the taxpayer’s 2020 tax year;
• the taxpayer receives a PPP covered loan that, at the end of the taxpayer’s 2020 tax year, the taxpayer expects to be forgiven in a subsequent tax year; and
• in a subsequent tax year, the taxpayer’s request for forgiveness of the covered loan is denied, in whole or in part, or the taxpayer decides never to request forgiveness of the covered loan.

A taxpayer may be able to deduct some or all of the eligible expenses on, as applicable:

• a timely (including extensions) original income tax return or information return for the 2020 tax year;
• an amended return or an administrative adjustment request (AAR) under Code Sec. 6227 for the 2020 tax year; or
• a timely (including extensions) original income tax return or information return for the subsequent tax year.

Applying Safe Harbor
To apply the safe harbor, a taxpayer attaches a statement titled "Revenue Procedure 2020-51 Statement" to the return on which the taxpayer deducts the expenses. The statement must include:

• the taxpayer’s name, address, and social security number or employer identification number;
• a statement specifying whether the taxpayer is an eligible taxpayer under either section 3.01 or section 3.02 of Revenue Procedure 2020-51;
• a statement that the taxpayer is applying section 4.01 or section 4.02 of Revenue Procedure 2020-51;
• the amount and date of disbursement of the taxpayer’s covered PPP loan;
• the total amount of covered loan forgiveness that the taxpayer was denied or decided to no longer seek;
• the date the taxpayer was denied or decided to no longer seek covered loan forgiveness; and
• the total amount of eligible expenses and non-deducted eligible expenses that are reported on the return.

The IRS has issued final regulations under Code Sec. 274 relating to the elimination of the employer deduction of for transportation and commuting fringe benefits by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97), effective for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2017. The final regulations address the disallowance of a deduction for the expense of any qualified transportation fringe (QTF) provided to an employee of the taxpayer. Guidance and methodologies are provided to determine the amount of QTF parking expenses that is nondeductible. The final regulations also address the disallowance of the deduction for expenses of transportation and commuting between an employee’s residence and place of employment.

The IRS has issued final regulations under Code Sec. 274 relating to the elimination of the employer deduction of for transportation and commuting fringe benefits by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97), effective for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2017. The final regulations address the disallowance of a deduction for the expense of any qualified transportation fringe (QTF) provided to an employee of the taxpayer. Guidance and methodologies are provided to determine the amount of QTF parking expenses that is nondeductible. The final regulations also address the disallowance of the deduction for expenses of transportation and commuting between an employee’s residence and place of employment.

The final regulations adopt earlier proposed regulations with a few minor modifications in response to public comments ( REG-119307-19). Pending issuance of these final regulations, taxpayers had been allowed to apply to proposed regulations or guidance issued in Notice 2018-99, I.R.B. 2018-52, 1067. Notice 2018-99 is obsoleted on the publication date of the final regulations.

The final regulations clarify an exception for parking spaces made available to the general public to provide that parking spaces used to park vehicles owned by members of the general public while the vehicle awaits repair or service are treated as provided to the general public.

The category of parking spaces for inventory or which are otherwise unusable by employees is clarified to provide that such spaces may also not be usable by the general public. In addition, taxpayers will be allowed to use any reasonable method to determine the number of inventory/unusable spaces in a parking facility.

The definition of "peak demand period" for purposes of determining the primary use of a parking facility is modified to cover situations where a taxpayer is affected by a federally declared disaster.

The final regulations also provide that taxpayers using the cost per parking space methodology for determining the disallowance for parking facilities may calculate the cost per space on a monthly basis.

Effective Date
The final regulations apply to tax years beginning on or after the date of publication in the Federal Register. However, taxpayers can choose to apply the regulations to tax years ending after December 31, 2019.

As part of a series of reminders, the IRS has urged taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season. A special page ( https://www.irs.gov/individuals/steps-to-take-now-to-get-a-jump-on-next-years-taxes), updated and available on the IRS website, outlines steps taxpayers can take now to make tax filing easier in 2021.

As part of a series of reminders, the IRS has urged taxpayers get ready for the upcoming tax filing season. A special page ( https://www.irs.gov/individuals/steps-to-take-now-to-get-a-jump-on-next-years-taxes), updated and available on the IRS website, outlines steps taxpayers can take now to make tax filing easier in 2021.

Taxpayers receiving substantial amounts of non-wage income like self-employment income, investment income, taxable Social Security benefits and, in some instances, pension and annuity income, should make quarterly estimated tax payments. The last payment for 2020 is due on January 15, 2021. Payment options can be found at IRS.gov/payments. For more information, the IRS encourages taxpayers to review Pub. 5348, Get Ready to File, and Pub. 5349, Year-Round Tax Planning is for Everyone.

Income
Most income is taxable, so taxpayers should gather income documents such as Forms W-2 from employers, Forms 1099 from banks and other payers, and records of virtual currencies or other income. Other income includes unemployment income, refund interest and income from the gig economy.

Forms and Notices
Beginning in 2020, individuals may receive Form 1099-NEC, Nonemployee Compensation, rather than Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income, if they performed certain services for and received payments from a business. The IRS recommends reviewing the Instructions for Form 1099-MISC and Form 1099-NEC to ensure clients are filing the appropriate form and are aware of this change.

Taxpayers may also need Notice 1444, Economic Impact Payment, which shows how much of a payment they received in 2020. This amount is needed to calculate any Recovery Rebate Credit they may be eligible for when they file their federal income tax return in 2021. People who did not receive an Economic Impact Payment in 2020 may qualify for the Recovery Rebate Credit when they file their 2020 taxes in 2021.

Additional Information
To see information from the most recently filed tax return and recent payments, taxpayers can sign up to view account information online. Taxpayers should notify the IRS of address changes and notify the Social Security Administration of a legal name change to avoid delays in tax return processing.

This year marks the 5th Annual National Tax Security Awareness Week-a collaboration by the IRS, state tax agencies and the tax industry. The IRS and the Security Summit partners have issued warnings to all taxpayers and tax professionals to beware of scams and identity theft schemes by criminals taking advantage of the combination of holiday shopping, the approaching tax season and coronavirus concerns. The 5th Annual National Tax Security Awareness Week coincided with Cyber Monday, the traditional start of the online holiday shopping season.

This year marks the 5th Annual National Tax Security Awareness Week-a collaboration by the IRS, state tax agencies and the tax industry. The IRS and the Security Summit partners have issued warnings to all taxpayers and tax professionals to beware of scams and identity theft schemes by criminals taking advantage of the combination of holiday shopping, the approaching tax season and coronavirus concerns. The 5th Annual National Tax Security Awareness Week coincided with Cyber Monday, the traditional start of the online holiday shopping season.

The following are a few basic steps which taxpayers and tax professionals should remember during the holidays and as the 2021 tax season approaches:

• use an updated security software for computers and mobile phones;
• the purchased anti-virus software must have a feature to stop malware and a firewall that can prevent intrusions;
• don't open links or attachments on suspicious emails because this year, fraud scams related to COVID-19 and the Economic Impact Payment are common;
• use strong and unique passwords for online accounts;
• use multi-factor authentication whenever possible which prevents thieves from easily hacking accounts;
• shop at sites where the web address begins with "https" and look for the "padlock" icon in the browser window;
• don't shop on unsecured public Wi-Fi in places like a mall;
• secure home Wi-Fis with a password;
• back up files on computers and mobile phones; and
• consider creating a virtual private network to securely connect to your workplace if working from home.

In addition, taxpayers can check out security recommendations for their specific mobile phone by reviewing the Federal Communications Commission's Smartphone Security Checker. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued warnings about fraud and scams related to COVID-19 schemes, anti-body testing, healthcare fraud, cryptocurrency fraud and others. COVID-related fraud complaints can be filed at the National Center for Disaster Fraud. Moreover, the Federal Trade Commission also has issued alerts about fraudulent emails claiming to be from the Centers for Disease Control or the World Health Organization. Taxpayers can keep atop the latest scam information and report COVID-related scams at www.FTC.gov/coronavirus.

The IRS has issued proposed regulations for the centralized partnership audit regime...

NPRM REG-123652-18

The IRS has issued proposed regulations for the centralized partnership audit regime that:

• clarify that a partnership with a QSub partner is not eligible to elect out of the centralized audit regime;
• add three new types of “special enforcement matters” and modify existing rules;
• modify existing guidance and regulations on push out elections and imputed adjustments; and
• clarify rules on partnerships that cease to exist.

The regulations are generally proposed to apply to partnership tax years ending after November 20, 2020, and to examinations and investigations beginning after the date the regs are finalized. However, the new special enforcement matters category for partnership-related items underlying non-partnership-related items is proposed to apply to partnership tax years beginning after December 20, 2018. In addition, the IRS and a partner could agree to apply any part of the proposed regulations governing special enforcement matters to any tax year of the partner that corresponds to a partnership tax year that is subject to the centralized partnership audit regime.

Centralized Audit Regime
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 ( P.L. 114-74) replaced the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) ( P.L. 97-248) partnership procedures with a centralized partnership audit regime for making partnership adjustments and tax determinations, assessments and collections at the partnership level. These changes were further amended by the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act) ( P.L. 114-113), and the Tax Technical Corrections Act of 2018 (TTCA) ( P.L. 115-141). The centralized audit regime, as amended, generally applies to returns filed for partnership tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

Election Out
A partnership with no more than 100 partners may generally elect out of the centralized audit regime if all of the partners are eligible partners. As predicted in Notice 2019-06, I.R.B. 2019-03, 353, the proposed regulations would provide that a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) is not an eligible partner; thus, a partnership with a QSub partner could not elect out of the centralized audit regime.

Special Enforcement Matters
The IRS may exempt “special enforcement matters” from the centralized audit regime. There are currently six categories of special enforcement matters:

• failures to comply with the requirements for a partnership-partner or S corporation partner to furnish statements or compute and pay an imputed underpayment;
• assessments relating to termination assessments of income tax or jeopardy assessments of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes;
• criminal investigations;
• indirect methods of proof of income;
• foreign partners or partnerships;
• other matters identified in IRS regulations.

The proposed regs would add three new types of special enforcement matters:

• partnership-related items underlying non-partnership-related items;
• controlled partnerships and extensions of the partner’s period of limitations; and
• penalties and taxes imposed on the partnership under chapter 1.

The proposed regs would also require the IRS to provide written notice of most special enforcement matters to taxpayers to whom the adjustments are being made.

The proposed regs would clarify that the IRS could adjust partnership-level items for a partner or indirect partner without regard to the centralized audit regime if the adjustment relates to termination and jeopardy assessments, if the partner is under criminal investigation, or if the adjustment is based on an indirect method of proof of income.

However, the proposed regs would also provide that the special enforcement matter rules would not apply to the extent the partner could demonstrate that adjustments to partnership-related items in the deficiency or an adjustment by the IRS were:

• previously taken into account under the centralized audit regime by the person being examined; or
• included in an imputed underpayment paid by a partnership (or pass-through partner) for any tax year in which the partner was a reviewed year partner or indirect partner, but only if the amount included in the deficiency or adjustment exceeds the amount reported by the partnership to the partner that was either reported by the partner or indirect partner or is otherwise included in the deficiency or adjustment determined by the IRS.

Push Out Election, Imputed Underpayments
The partnership adjustment rules generally do not apply to a partnership that makes a "push out" election to push the adjustment out to the partners. However, the partnership must pay any chapter 1 taxes, penalties, additions to tax, and additional amounts or the amount of any adjustment to an imputed underpayment. Thus, there must be a mechanism for including these amounts in the imputed underpayment and accounting for these amounts.

In calculating an imputed underpayment, the proposed regs would generally include any adjustments to the partnership’s chapter 1 liabilities in the credit grouping and treat them similarly to credit adjustments. Adjustments that do not result in an imputed underpayment generally could increase or decrease non-separately stated income or loss, as appropriate, depending on whether the adjustment is to an item of income or loss. The proposed regs would also treat a decrease in a chapter 1 liability as a negative adjustment that normally does not result in an imputed underpayment if: (1) the net negative adjustment is to a credit, unless the IRS determines to have it offset the imputed underpayment; or (2) the imputed underpayment is zero or less than zero.

Under existing regs for calculating an imputed underpayment, an adjustment to a non-income item that is related to, or results from, an adjustment to an item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit is generally treated as zero, unless the IRS determines that the adjustment should be included in the imputed underpayment. The proposed regs would clarify this rule and extend it to persons other than the IRS. Thus, a partnership that files an administrative adjustment request (AAR) could treat an adjustment to a non-income item as zero if the adjustment is related to, and the effect is reflected in, an adjustment to an item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit (unless the IRS subsequently determines in an AAR examination that both adjustments should be included in the calculation of the imputed underpayment).

A partnership would take into account adjustments to non-income items in the adjustment year by adjusting the item on its adjustment year return to be consistent with the adjustment. This would apply only to the extent the item would appear on the adjustment year return without regard to the adjustment. If the item already appeared on the partnership’s adjustment year return as a non-income item, or appeared as a non-income item on any return of the partnership for a tax year between the reviewed year and the adjustment year, the partnership does not create a new item on the partnership’s adjustment year return.

A passthrough partner that is paying an amount as part of an amended return submitted as part of a request to modify an imputed underpayment would take into account any adjustments that do not result in an imputed underpayment in the partners’ tax year that includes the date the payment is made. This provision, however, would not apply if no payment is made by the partnership because no payment is required.

Partnership Ceases to Exist
If a partnership ceases to exist before the partnership adjustments take effect, the adjustments are taken into account by the former partners of the partnership. The IRS may assess a former partner for that partner’s proportionate share of any amounts owed by the partnership under the centralized partnership audit regime. The proposed regs would clarify that a partnership adjustment takes effect when the adjustments become finally determined; that is, when the partnership and IRS enter into a settlement agreement regarding the adjustment; or, for adjustments reflected in an AAR, when the AAR is filed. The proposed regs would also make conforming changes to existing regs:

• A partnership ceases to exist if the IRS determines that the partnership does not have the ability to pay in full any amount that the partnership may become liable for under the centralized partnership audit regime.
• Existing regs that describe when the IRS will not determine that a partnership ceases to exist would be removed.
• Statements must be furnished to the former partners and filed with the IRS no later than 60 days after the later of the date the IRS notifies the partnership that it has ceased to exist or the date the adjustments take effect.

The proposed regs would also modify the definition of "former partners" to be partners of the partnership during the last tax year for which a partnership return or AAR was filed, or the most recent persons determined to be the partners in a final determination, such as a final court decision, defaulted notice of final partnership adjustment (FPA), or settlement agreement.

Comments Requested
Comments are requested on all aspects of the proposed regulations by January 22, 2021. The IRS strongly encourages commenters to submit comments electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-123652-18). Comments submitted on paper will be considered to the extent practicable.

The IRS has issued final regulations with guidance on how a tax-exempt organization can determine whether it has more than one unrelated trade or business, how it should identify its separate trades and businesses, and how to separately calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) for each trade or business – often referred to as "silo" rules. Since 2018, under provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the loss from one unrelated trade or business may not offset the income from another, separate trade or business. Congress did not provide detailed methods of determining when unrelated businesses are "separate" for purposes of calculating UBTI.

The IRS has issued final regulations with guidance on how a tax-exempt organization can determine whether it has more than one unrelated trade or business, how it should identify its separate trades and businesses, and how to separately calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) for each trade or business – often referred to as "silo" rules. Since 2018, under provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the loss from one unrelated trade or business may not offset the income from another, separate trade or business. Congress did not provide detailed methods of determining when unrelated businesses are "separate" for purposes of calculating UBTI.

On April 24, 2020, the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking ( REG-106864-18) that proposed guidance on how an exempt organization determines if it has more than one unrelated trade or business and, if so, how the exempt organization calculates UBTI under Code Sec. 512(a)(6). The final regulations substantially adopt the proposed regulations issued earlier this year, with modifications.

Separate Trades or Businesses
The proposed regulations suggested using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) six-digit codes for determining what constitutes separate trades or businesses. Notice 2018-67, I.R.B. 2018-36, 409, permitted tax-exempt organizations to rely on these codes. The first two digits of the code designate the economic sector of the business. The proposed guidance provided that organizations could make that determination using just the first two digits of the code, which divides businesses into 20 categories, for this purpose.

The proposed regulations provided that, once an organization has identified a separate unrelated trade or business using a particular NAICS two-digit code, the it could only change the two-digit code describing that separate unrelated trade or business if two specific requirements were met. The final regulations remove the restriction on changing NAICS two-digit codes, and instead require an exempt organization that changes the identification of a separate unrelated trade or business to report the change in the tax year of the change in accordance with forms and instructions.

QPIs
For exempt organizations, the activities of a partnership are generally considered the activities of the exempt organization partners. Code Sec. 512(c) provides that if a trade or business regularly carried on by a partnership of which an exempt organization is a member is an unrelated trade or business with respect to such organization, that organization must include its share of the gross income of the partnership in UBTI.

The proposed regulations provided that an exempt organization’s partnership interest is a "qualifying partnership interest" (QPI) if it meets the requirements of the de minimis test by directly or indirectly holding no more than two percent of the profits interest and no more than two percent of the capital interest. For administrative convenience, the de minimis test allows certain partnership investments to be treated as an investment activity and aggregated with other investment activities. Additionally, the proposed regulations permitted the aggregation of any QPI with all other QPIs, resulting in an aggregate group of QPIs.

Once an organization designates a partnership interest as a QPI (in accordance with forms and instructions), it cannot thereafter identify the trades or businesses conducted by the partnership that are unrelated trades or businesses with respect to the exempt organization using NAICS two-digit codes unless and until the partnership interest is no longer a QPI.

A change in an exempt organization’s percentage interest in a partnership that is due entirely to the actions of other partners may present significant difficulties for the exempt organization. Requiring the interest to be removed from the exempt organization’s investment activities in one year but potentially included as a QPI in the next would create further administrative difficulty. Therefore, the final regulations adopt a grace period that permits a partnership interest to be treated as meeting the requirements of the de minimis test or the participation test, respectively, in the exempt organization’s prior tax year if certain requirements are met. This grace period will allow an exempt organization to treat such interest as a QPI in the tax year that such change occurs, but the organization will need to reduce its percentage interest before the end of the following tax year to meet the requirements of either the de minimis test or the participation test in that succeeding tax year for the partnership interest to remain a QPI.

The IRS has modified Rev. Proc. 2007-32, I.R.B. 2007-22, 1322, to provide that the term of a Gaming Industry Tip Compliance Agreement (GITCA) is generally five years, and the renewal term of a GITCA is extended from three years to a term of up to five years. A GITCA executed under Rev. Proc. 2003-35, 2003-1 CB 919 and Rev. Proc. 2007-32 will remain in effect until the expiration date set forth in that agreement, unless modified by the renewal of a GITCA under section 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007-32 (as modified by section 3 of this revenue procedure).

The IRS has modified Rev. Proc. 2007-32, I.R.B. 2007-22, 1322, to provide that the term of a Gaming Industry Tip Compliance Agreement (GITCA) is generally five years, and the renewal term of a GITCA is extended from three years to a term of up to five years. A GITCA executed under Rev. Proc. 2003-35, 2003-1 CB 919 and Rev. Proc. 2007-32 will remain in effect until the expiration date set forth in that agreement, unless modified by the renewal of a GITCA under section 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007-32 (as modified by section 3 of this revenue procedure).

The modified provisions generally provide as follows:

• In general, a GITCA shall be for a term of five years. For new properties and properties that do not have a prior agreement with the IRS, however, the initial term of the agreement may be for a shorter period.
• A GITCA may be renewed for additional terms of up to five years, in accordance with Section IX of the model GITCA. Beginning not later than six months before the termination date of a GITCA, the IRS and the employer must begin discussions as to any appropriate revisions to the agreement, including any appropriate revisions to the tip rates described in Section VIII of the model GITCA. If the IRS and the employer have not reached final agreement on the terms and conditions of a renewal agreement, the parties may mutually agree to extend the existing agreement for an appropriate time to finalize and execute a renewal agreement.

Effective Date
This revenue procedure is effective November 23, 2020.

Final regulations issued by the Treasury and IRS coordinate the extraordinary disposition rule that applies with respect to the Code Sec. 245A dividends received deduction and the disqualified basis rule under the Code Sec. 951A global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime. Information reporting rules are also finalized.

Final regulations issued by the Treasury and IRS coordinate the extraordinary disposition rule that applies with respect to the Code Sec. 245A dividends received deduction and the disqualified basis rule under the Code Sec. 951A global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime. Information reporting rules are also finalized.

Extraordinary Disposition Rule and GILTI Disqualified Basis Rule
The extraordinary disposition rule (EDR) in Reg. §1.245A-5 and the GILTI disqualified basis rule (DBR) in Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(5) both address the disqualified period that results from the differences between dates for which the transition tax under Code Sec. 965 and the GILTI rules apply. GILTI applies to calendar year controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) on January 1, 2018. A fiscal year CFC may have a period from January 1, 2018, until the beginning of its first tax year in 2018 (the disqualified period) in which it can generate income subject to neither the transition tax under Code Sec. 965 nor GILTI.

The extraordinary disposition rule limits the ability to claim the Code Sec. 245A deduction for certain earnings and profits generated during the disqualified period. Specifically, Reg. §1.245A-5 provides that the deduction is limited for dividends paid out of an extraordinary disposition account. Final regulations issued under GILTI address fair market basis generated as a result of assets transferred to related CFCs during the disqualified period (disqualified basis). Reg. §1.951A-2(c)(5) allocates deductions or losses attributable to disqualified basis to residual CFC income, such as income other than tested income, subpart F income, or effectively connected taxable income. As a result, the deductions or losses will not reduce the CFC’s income subject to U.S. tax.

Coordination Rules
The coordination rules are necessary to prevent excess taxation of a Code Sec. 245A shareholder. Excess taxation can occur because the earnings and profits subject to the extraordinary disposition rule and the basis to which the disqualified basis rule applies are generally a function of a single amount of gain.

Under the coordination rules, to the extent that the Code Sec. 245A deduction is limited with respect to distributions out of an extraordinary disposition account, a corresponding amount of disqualified basis attributable to the property that generated that extraordinary disposition account through an extraordinary disposition is converted to basis that is not subject to the disqualified basis rule. The rule is referred to as the disqualified basis (DQB) reduction rule.

A prior extraordinary disposition amount is also covered under this rule. A prior extraordinary disposition amount generally represents the extraordinary disposition of earnings and profits that have become subject to U.S. tax as to a Code Sec. 245A shareholder other than by direct application of the extraordinary disposition rule (e.g., inclusions as a result of investment in U.S. property under Code Sec. 956).

Separate coordination rules are provided, depending upon whether the application of the rule is in a simple or complex case.

Reporting Requirements
Every U.S. shareholder of a CFC that holds an item of property that has disqualified basis during an annual accounting period and files Form 5471 for that period must report information about the items of property with disqualified basis held by the CFC during the CFC’s accounting period, as required by Form 5471 and its instructions.

Additionally, information must be reported about the reduction to an extraordinary disposition account made pursuant to the regulations and reductions made to an item of specified property’s disqualified basis pursuant to the regulations during the corporation’s accounting period, as required by Form 5471 and its instructions.

Applicability Dates
The regulations apply to tax years of foreign corporations beginning on or after the date the regulations are published in the Federal Register, and to tax years of Code Sec. 245A shareholders in which or with which such tax years end. Taxpayers may choose to apply the regulations to years before the regulations apply.

Health flexible spending arrangements (health FSAs) are popular savings vehicles for medical expenses, but their use has been held back by a strict use-or-lose rule. The IRS recently announced a significant change to encourage more employers to offer health FSAs and boost enrollment. At the plan sponsor's option, employees participating in health FSAs will be able to carry over, instead of forfeiting, up to $500 of unused funds remaining at year-end.

Health flexible spending arrangements (health FSAs) are popular savings vehicles for medical expenses, but their use has been held back by a strict use-or-lose rule. The IRS recently announced a significant change to encourage more employers to offer health FSAs and boost enrollment. At the plan sponsor's option, employees participating in health FSAs will be able to carry over, instead of forfeiting, up to $500 of unused funds remaining at year-end.

Health expenses

Health FSAs are designed to reimburse participants for certain health care expenditures, typically expenses that qualify for the medical and dental expense deduction. Medical supplies, such as eye glasses and bandages, are usually treated as qualified expenses. However, nonprescription medicines (other than insulin) are not considered qualified medical expenses.

Health FSAs are often funded through voluntary salary reduction agreements with the participant's employer under a cafeteria plan. In that case, they are very taxpayer-friendly because no federal employment or federal income taxes are deducted from the employee's contribution. The employer may also contribute to a health FSA. However, there are special rules which govern employer contributions.

Typically, participants designate at the beginning of the year the amount they want to contribute to their health FSA and these amounts are deducted from their pay. For 2014, an employee's salary reduction contributions cannot exceed $2,500. The $2,500 cap is very important because cafeteria plans that do not limit health FSA contributions to $2,500 are not treated as cafeteria plans, and all benefits offered under the plan are included in the participants' gross income.

Use-or-lose rule

As mentioned, the use-or-lose rule is a drawback to health FSAs. Unused amounts remaining in the health FSA at year-end are forfeited. Employers are not allowed to refund any unused funds in a health FSA. Critics of the use-or-lose rule argue that it has discouraged participation in health FSAs because many employees do not want to risk forfeiting unused funds. Often, participants have to scramble at year-end to use their health FSA dollars

Grace period option

A few years ago, the IRS modified the use-or-lose rule. The IRS allowed cafeteria plans to adopt a grace period. Participants can use amounts remaining in a health FSA at year-end for up to an additional two months and 15 days. This grace period is optional. Employers are not required to offer the grace period, although many do.

Carryover option

At its option, an employer may now amend its cafeteria plan to provide for the carryover to the immediately following year of up to $500 of any amount remaining unused as of the end of the year in a health FSA. The carryover of up to $500 may be used to pay or reimburse qualified expenses under the health FSA incurred during the entire plan year to which it is carried over. Additionally, the carryover does not count against or otherwise affect the salary reduction limit ($2,500 for 2014) for health FSAs. However, the new rules do not allow participants to cash out unused health FSA amounts or convert them to other types of benefits.

The maximum carryover amount is $500. An employer can choose to offer a $0 carryover, a $500 carryover or any amount in between. As we discussed, the carryover is optional. Employers can choose not to offer any carryover.

Employers cannot offer both the grace period and the carryover. It is a choice of either the grace period or the carryover....or neither. The employer and not the participant decides. In regulations, the IRS described how employers can amend their cafeteria plans to provide for the carryover and how they can, if they choose, replace the grace period with the carryover.

Let's take a look at an example: Jacob participates in a health FSA under his employer's cafeteria plan. At year-end, Jacob has $255 remaining in his health FSA. Jacob's employer never offered a grace period but opted to allow participants to carry over up to $300 of unused health FSA dollars. Jacob can carry over all of his $255 in unused health FSA dollars.

If you have any questions about the new carryover option or health FSAs, please contact our office.

Notice 2013-71

The IRS has made several changes to its examination (aka, "audit") functions that are designed to expedite the process and relieve some burden on business taxpayers. These include the expansion of the Fast Track Settlement (FTS) program for small business, self-employed (SB/SE) taxpayers and a new process for issuing information document requests (IDRs) in large case audits.

The IRS has made several changes to its examination (aka, "audit") functions that are designed to expedite the process and relieve some burden on business taxpayers. These include the expansion of the Fast Track Settlement (FTS) program for small business, self-employed (SB/SE) taxpayers and a new process for issuing information document requests (IDRs) in large case audits.

Fast Track Settlement

The IRS launched the FTS program in 2005 to help small business taxpayers expedite case resolution. Small business FTS is modeled on a similar program for taxpayers in the IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) Division.

The goal of small business FTS is to complete cases within 60 days of their acceptance into the program. Under FTS, taxpayers under examination with issues in dispute work directly with IRS representatives from SB/SE's Examination Division and Appeals to resolve those issues. An Appeals Officer, trained in mediation, serves as a neutral party and employs dispute resolution techniques to facilitate settlement between the parties.

Application. To request to participate in small business FTS, the taxpayer and the SB/SE Group Manager submit Form 14017, Application for Fast Track Settlement. The taxpayer or the IRS examination representative may initiate Fast Track for eligible cases, usually before a 30-day letter is issued.

If the case is accepted and an agreement is reached, the IRS will use established issue or case closing procedures and applicable agreement forms, including preparation of a Form 906 specific matters closing agreement, if appropriate. If the case is not accepted the IRS explained that SB/SE or Appeals will inform the taxpayer of the basis for this decision and discuss other dispute resolution opportunities.

Qualifying issues. Small business FTS is generally available if:

• Issues are fully developed;
• The taxpayer has stated a position in writing or filed a small case request for cases in which the total amount for any tax period is less than $25,000; and
• There are a limited number of unagreed issues.

Small business FTS is unavailable for Collection Appeals Program, Collection Due Process, Offer-In-Compromise and Trust Fund Recovery cases, except as provided in any guidance issued by the IRS; correspondence examination cases worked solely in a Campus/Service Center site; and cases in which the taxpayer has failed to respond to IRS communications.

Information Document Requests

The IRS Large Business & International (LB&I) Division has issued a new directive (LB&I-04-1113-009) that expands on an earlier directive from in June (LB&I-04-0613-004) by itemizing the requirements for IRS agents preparing information document requests (IDRs). The new directive also outlines the mandatory three-part enforcement process for taxpayers that do not timely respond to an IDR. While IDRs are common for large business taxpayers, the IRS also uses them in auditing certain small business issues.

June directive. The original June 2013 directive set forth general principles and several mandatory actions that examiners must take while issuing IDRs. These principles are reiterated in the November directive.

The June directive also provided that IDRs issued after June 30, 2013 must comply with these principles. In particular, the IRS reported that the mandatory training emphasized that employees must focus their IDRs on specific issues relevant to the exam. IRS employees are required to discuss the IDRs and issues with the taxpayer, as well as what would be an appropriate deadline for the response to the request. The deadline must fall within a "reasonable timeframe" and be "mutually agreed upon." If the examiner does not receive a response by this date, and the IDR otherwise met the requirements listed under the directive, the case will proceed into the enforcement process outlined in the new directive from November 2013.

November directive. If a taxpayer does not respond to the IRS by the date indicated in the IDR, the case must proceed to the graduated, three-step enforcement process outlined in Attachment 2 of the November directive. This process, assuming the taxpayer could not respond to the IDRs by the dates specified at each step, would involve first a delinquency notice, then a pre-summons letter, and finally a summons.

The IRS has recently promoted the revised IDR enforcement process as a "win-win" for both the IRS and taxpayers. However, some practitioners have expressed concerns that the rigid deadlines in the new enforcement process will have the opposite effect and result in more summonses being issued. Practitioners recommend that taxpayers proactively involve themselves in the initial IDR process to ensure that the IDR, once issued, provides them with enough time to supply the requested information.

If you have questions relating to the IRS's new FTS or IDR programs, please contact our offices.